If an employee storms into your bedroom before work to complain about a resident, do you have grounds for summary dismissal? This exact scenario was heard by the Fair Work Commission on 10 July 2018. A groundsman at a South Australian caravan park applied for an unfair dismissal remedy after his employer fired him on the spot.
The Incident: A Breach of Privacy
The conflict began with a verbal altercation. The groundsman confronted a park resident for exceeding the 8kph speed limit. During the argument, the resident called the groundsman “lazy.” This left the employee extremely agitated.
The groundsman then entered the park manager’s personal onsite residence. He walked down the hallway to the bedroom door and woke the sleeping manager to vent his frustrations.
Determining Grounds for Summary Dismissal
Later that day, the manager reviewed the Fair Work website and company policies. He decided the invasion of privacy constituted “serious misconduct.” Two days later, he phoned the groundsman to terminate his employment effective immediately. The employee received no pay in lieu of notice.
For a dismissal to be fair, there must be a valid reason. The manager argued that entering a private bedroom without permission was that reason. However, the Commission disagreed.
The Fair Work Commission Ruling
The judge found that the actions did not meet the legal grounds for summary dismissal. The ruling stated that serious misconduct must “strike at the heart of the employment relationship.” This makes continuing the relationship impossible.
The judge noted the groundsman’s behavior was “foolish and inappropriate.” It was reckless to wake a manager for a non-emergency. However, the conduct was not severe enough to make the employment unviable.
Was the Dismissal Fair?
The Commission concluded that the conduct justified a final warning or dismissal with notice. Because the employer chose instant termination, the judge ruled the dismissal was unreasonable and harsh. There were no valid grounds for summary dismissal in this specific context.
Check our HR website
What do you think? Do you think the outcome was fair to the employer? Why/why not? Give us a call today to discuss, or share your thoughts on our Facebook page.
Case: Mr Carl Barone v Zero In Pty Ltd T/A Shoreline Caravan Park [2018] FWC 3993 (10 July 2018)
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FWC/2018/3993.html
Want to learn more? Give us a call on 1800 577 515 or email at info@assurancehr.com.au. Alternatively you can book a video chat with Adrian Clark.
